🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be cut by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils could only create a Māori ward by first putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often spent years generating local support and pushing their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to hold binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – most cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to create different wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.