🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously went for the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. So there was some opposition. But overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.